Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MCMI-III diagnostic validity: bad test or bad validity study

P Retzlaff1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley 80639, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towers of Hanoi and London: Reliability and Validity of Two Executive Function Tasks.

Assessment·2015
Same author

Measuring self-efficacy in people with multiple sclerosis: a validation study.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1996
Same author

Compensation and pension evaluations: psychotic, neurotic, and post-traumatic stress disorder Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory II profiles.

Military medicine·1995
Same author

Event-related potentials during delayed recognition of Wechsler Memory Scale-R paired associate learning.

Journal of clinical psychology·1995
Same author

Relationships between measures of auditory verbal learning and executive functioning.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·1994
Same author

Air Force mental health consultation: a six-year retention follow-up.

Military medicine·1993

The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) shows poor predictive accuracy for diagnoses. A new validity study is essential to confirm its clinical utility and diagnostic performance.

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Clinical psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Operating characteristics are crucial for evaluating diagnostic test validity.
  • Key validity statistics for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) are not fully published.
  • Previous versions, like the MCMI-II, provide a comparative baseline.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To calculate and assess the operating characteristics, specifically positive predictive power, of the MCMI-III scales.
  • To compare the MCMI-III's predictive validity against the MCMI-II.
  • To identify limitations in the initial MCMI-III validity study.

Main Methods:

  • Calculation of positive predictive powers from available MCMI-III statistics.
  • Comparison of calculated MCMI-III statistics with published MCMI-II data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical review of the methodology and execution of the MCMI-III validity study.

    • Main Results:

    • The positive predictive powers of the MCMI-III scales are inadequate in absolute terms.
    • MCMI-III's predictive validity is poor relative to the MCMI-II.
    • The initial MCMI-III validity study had inherent and execution-related flaws.

    Conclusions:

    • The MCMI-III demonstrates poor diagnostic predictive power based on available data.
    • Concerns exist regarding the methodology of the MCMI-III's initial validity assessment.
    • A new, rigorous validity study is required to ascertain the MCMI-III's true clinical utility.