Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding and complying with the Georgia Health Records Act

R N Berg1

  • 1Vincent, Berg, Stalzer & Menendez, Atlanta, Georgia 30326, USA.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Physicians must comply with Georgia

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health care corporate compliance programs.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1998
Same author

What happens after a physician reports suspected child abuse?

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1998
Same author

The legality of waiving copayments and granting professional courtesies.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1997
Same author

Restrictive covenant analysis in Georgia: sacrificing predictability for fairness.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1997
Same author

Utilizing advanced healthcare directives: a true (for the most part) story.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1997
Same author

Fiction or reality? The Zagoria case and derivative professional liability.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1996

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Healthcare Compliance
  • Patient Rights

Background:

  • Physicians know they must provide medical records in some cases.
  • Many are unaware of Georgia's specific statute for medical record release.
  • The Georgia Health Records Act (GHRA) has specific physician requirements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To inform physicians about the GHRA.
  • To analyze the first appellate interpretation of the GHRA.
  • To ensure healthcare provider compliance with patient record access.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Georgia state statutes.
  • Analysis of a recent Georgia Court of Appeals case.
  • Legal interpretation of healthcare provider obligations.

Main Results:

  • Georgia has had a specific medical records statute since 1984.
  • The Georgia Court of Appeals recently interpreted the GHRA.
  • The ruling clarifies physician duties regarding patient record copies.

Conclusions:

  • Physicians must be aware of and adhere to the GHRA.
  • The recent appellate case provides crucial guidance on the Act's application.
  • Understanding these legal requirements is vital for healthcare providers in Georgia.

Related Experiment Videos