Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized studies in endoscopic surgery--where is the proof?

F Nagele1, B G Molnár, H O'Connor

  • 1University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass grafting on long-term prognosis.

European heart journal·2022
Same author

[Analysis of udder health in relation to antimicrobial usage in Swiss dairy farms].

Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde·2019
Same author

Application of multiple behaviour change models to identify determinants of farmers' biosecurity attitudes and behaviours.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2018
Same author

Long-term follow-up of the incidence of Helicobacter pylori.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2017
Same author

Prevena™, negative pressure wound therapy applied to closed Pfannenstiel incisions at time of caesarean section in patients deemed at high risk for wound infection.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2014
Same author

Helicobacter pylori resistance rates for levofloxacin, tetracycline and rifabutin among Irish isolates at a reference centre.

Irish journal of medical science·2013

Evidence for common gynecological endoscopic procedures is limited, with few controlled or randomized studies available. Uncontrolled series provide crucial data, informing the clinical role of these gynecological surgeries.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecological Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Endoscopic Techniques

Background:

  • Gynaecological endoscopic procedures are increasingly common.
  • Evidence-based practice relies on robust clinical studies.
  • High-quality evidence for these procedures is often lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the available evidence for common gynaecological endoscopic procedures.
  • To assess the current understanding of indications, efficacy, and complications.
  • To determine the role of these procedures in routine clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of existing literature.
  • Analysis of controlled and uncontrolled studies.
  • Evaluation of randomized controlled trials where available.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Controlled studies and randomized trials are rare for gynaecological endoscopy.
  • Large uncontrolled series provide significant data.
  • Sufficient information exists for many procedures to define their clinical utility.

Conclusions:

  • The evidence base for gynaecological endoscopic procedures is developing.
  • Uncontrolled data is essential given the scarcity of controlled trials.
  • The role of common gynaecological endoscopic procedures in routine practice is becoming clearer.