Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

6.8K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
6.8K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

2.2K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Familiality of diabetes mellitus.

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association·2007
Same author

Severity assessment in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis using the pediatric component of the Comprehensive Severity Index.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies·2003
Same author

Building a comprehensive clinical information system from components. The approach at Intermountain Health Care.

Methods of information in medicine·2003
Same author

Combining decision support methodologies to diagnose pneumonia.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same author

Automatic identification of patients eligible for a pneumonia guideline: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two decision support models.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2001
Same author

A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K

Lessons from evaluating an automated patient severity index

R F Gibson1, P J Haug, S D Horn

  • 1Division of Information Services, Providence Health System, Portland, OR, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Automated severity of illness scoring shows promise but requires further development. Current systems, both automated and manual, have limitations impacting accuracy and reliability in clinical information systems.

More Related Videos

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
02:28

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Data Management
  • Medical Information Systems

Background:

  • Hospital clinical information systems generate vast amounts of patient data.
  • Severity of illness indices are crucial for patient care assessment and resource allocation.
  • Manual chart review for severity scoring is time-consuming and prone to errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an automated interface for calculating severity of illness scores.
  • To identify lessons learned from integrating a clinical information system with a severity index.
  • To compare automated scoring with manual chart review methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an automated system to convert electronic patient findings into Computerized Severity Index (CSI) attributes.
  • Assessed performance by comparing automated CSI scores with manually derived scores.
  • Analyzed discrepancies and errors in both automated and manual scoring methods.

Main Results:

  • Automated CSI scores matched manual scores in 61% of cases.
  • Errors in automated scoring stemmed from missing codes or inconsistent data entry.
  • Manual scoring also presented significant challenges, hindering the establishment of a definitive gold standard.

Conclusions:

  • Automated severity of illness indices offer significant potential but need performance improvements.
  • Current automated and manual methods are not yet adequate for reliable severity assessment.
  • Further research is essential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of automated severity scoring systems.