Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using compensating filters to reduce radiation dose

T Katsuda1, M Okazaki, C Kuroda

  • 1Radiological Technology Section, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan.

Radiologic Technology
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiation dose in mass screening for gastric cancer with high-concentration barium sulfate compared with moderate-concentration barium sulfate.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2009
Same author

Development and aging of the cerebrum: assessment with proton MR spectroscopy.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2001
Same author

Low-cost soft-copy display accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy subtraction: comparison with hard-copy viewing.

Journal of digital imaging·2000
Same author

Comparison between computer-aided diagnosis and radiologists: assessment of pulmonary blood flow on chest radiographs.

Journal of thoracic imaging·2000
Same author

Ground-glass opacity on thin-section CT: value in differentiating subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the lung.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1999
Same author

Quantitative fluorescent RT-PCR measurements of postnatal calcium channel gene expression in rat hippocampal subfields.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1999
Same journal

An Intentional and Ethical Integration of AI in Medical Imaging.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Benefits of Integrating AI Into Computer-Aided Detection Systems.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

A Practice-Aligned Approach to Integrating AI in Radiation Sciences Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Site Visitors: The Unsung Heroes of the Accreditation Process.

Radiologic technology·2026
Same journal

Extended Reality Innovations in Medical Imaging Education.

Radiologic technology·2026
See all related articles

Compensating filters significantly reduce radiation exposure during medical imaging procedures. These filters decreased radiation by up to 80% in lower extremity radiographs, enhancing patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Radiological physics
  • Medical imaging technology
  • Radiation protection

Background:

  • Medical imaging utilizes ionizing radiation, necessitating strategies to minimize patient exposure.
  • Compensating filters are devices designed to modulate the X-ray beam spectrum and intensity.
  • Optimizing filter use can improve image quality while reducing radiation dose.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of compensating filters in reducing radiation exposure across various radiographic examinations.
  • To quantify the dose reduction achieved by filters in skull, hepatic angiograph, and lower extremity imaging.
  • To assess the impact of filter placement on absorbed dose in a phantom model.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of radiation exposure levels with and without compensating filters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements of absorbed dose in a phantom at a specific depth (5 cm) with and without a skull filter.
  • Application of filters between the X-ray tube and the patient during radiographic procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Filters reduced radiation exposure by 29% in skull radiographs.
    • Hepatic angiographs showed a 47% reduction in exposure with filters.
    • One-shot full-length lower extremity radiographs demonstrated an 80% exposure reduction.
    • Absorbed dose in the filtered area of a skull phantom decreased by over 26%.

    Conclusions:

    • Compensating filters are effective tools for reducing patient radiation dose in diagnostic radiology.
    • The degree of dose reduction varies depending on the anatomical region and radiographic technique.
    • Strategic placement of filters is crucial for maximizing radiation dose reduction.