Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Posture prediction for static sagittal-plane lifting

M J Dysart1, J C Woldstad

  • 1Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

Journal of Biomechanics
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Human lifting posture prediction models were tested. Minimizing total torque (effort) best predicted postures, especially for higher hand positions, though errors remained significant.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple two-dimensional displays as an alternative to three-dimensional displays in telerobotic tasks.

Human factors·2001
Same author

Torso loading via a harness method activates trunk muscles less than a hand loading method.

Journal of biomechanics·1998
Same author

Forces applied to large hand wheels.

Applied ergonomics·1995
Same author

Floor/shoe slip resistance measurement.

American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1992

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Human posture analysis

Background:

  • Predicting human postures during lifting is crucial for ergonomics and injury prevention.
  • Existing models often simplify the complex biomechanics of lifting tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare three inverse-kinematics models for predicting postures during static sagittal lifting.
  • To evaluate models based on minimizing overall effort, local effort, and maximizing stability.

Main Methods:

  • Developed three models using inverse-kinematics with different objective functions: minimum total torque, minimum local effort, and maximum stability.
  • Compared model predictions against postures assumed by 16 subjects performing 4 static lifting tasks.

Main Results:

  • All models showed prediction errors significantly greater than zero.
  • The minimum total torque model demonstrated higher accuracy than the other two criteria.
  • Model accuracy decreased with lower hand positions compared to higher ones.

Conclusions:

  • Minimizing total torque is a more effective criterion for predicting sagittal lifting postures than local effort minimization or stability maximization.
  • Further refinement is needed, particularly for predicting postures with lower hand placements.

Related Experiment Videos