Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Basic occupational epidemiologic measures

G M Marsh1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|July 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A constrained maximum likelihood approach to evaluate the impact of dose metric on cancer risk assessment: application to β-chloroprene.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2014
Same author

Aspartame: a safety evaluation based on current use levels, regulations, and toxicological and epidemiological studies.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2007
Same author

Cancer dose--response assessment for acrylonitrile based upon rodent brain tumor incidence: use of epidemiologic, mechanistic, and pharmacokinetic support for nonlinearity.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2005
Same author

Historical cohort study of US man-made vitreous fiber production workers: I. 1992 fiberglass cohort follow-up: initial findings.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
Same author

Historical cohort study of US man-made vitreous fiber production workers: II. Mortality from mesothelioma.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
Same author

Historical cohort study of US man-made vitreous fiber production workers: III. Analysis of exposure-weighted measures of respirable fibers and formaldehyde in the nested case-control study of respiratory system cancer.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
Same journal

Mental health issues: ethical considerations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethics in the locker room: the challenges for team physicians.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in worker productivity.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Protecting posterity: the occupational physician's ethical and legal obligations to pregnant workers.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Genetic testing: ethical implications in the workplace.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in occupational disease outbreak investigations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
See all related articles

This chapter explains measures of effect in occupational epidemiology, focusing on the response in exposure-response relationships. It also covers statistical standardization for comparing groups with different characteristics like age.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Understanding exposure-response relationships is crucial in occupational health.
  • Measures of effect quantify health outcomes related to workplace exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize common measures of effect in occupational epidemiology.
  • To explain statistical standardization for comparing exposure-response data.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common statistical measures of effect.
  • Description of basic statistical standardization procedures.

Main Results:

  • Common measures of effect are presented.
  • Standardization techniques for age and other factors are discussed.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Effective use of measures of effect and standardization is key for accurate occupational epidemiologic research.
  • These methods aid in comparing health outcomes across different demographic groups.