Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Body composition in pregnancy

S V Jaque-Fortunato1, N Khodiguian, R Artal

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

Seminars in Perinatology
|August 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orthopedic Problems in Pregnancy.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Exercise during pregnancy: safe and beneficial for most.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2010
Same author

Exercise: an alternative therapy for gestational diabetes.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2010
Same author

Central adiposity, aerobic fitness, and blood pressure in premenopausal Hispanic women.

International journal of sports medicine·2004
Same author

Bone mineral density in Hispanic women: role of aerobic capacity, fat-free mass, and adiposity.

International journal of sports medicine·2004
Same author

Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

British journal of sports medicine·2003

Pregnancy hydration changes may affect body composition accuracy. Different measurement methods yield varying results, highlighting the need for reliable pregnancy body composition assessment. Further research is crucial.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Obstetrics
  • Body Composition Analysis

Background:

  • Pregnancy involves significant physiological changes, including altered hydration status.
  • Standard body composition methods may be less accurate during pregnancy due to these changes.
  • Accurate body composition assessment is vital for maternal and fetal health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in body composition measurements at various gestational stages (30 weeks, 39 weeks) and postpartum.
  • To compare body composition results obtained via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and hydrostatic weighing (HW) during pregnancy.
  • To evaluate the impact of measurement methodology on gestational age-related body composition findings.

Main Methods:

  • Preliminary study involving nine pregnant subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Body composition assessed using both bioelectrical impedance and hydrostatic weighing.
  • Measurements taken at 30 weeks gestation, 39 weeks gestation, and postpartum.

    • Main Results:

    • Body composition results varied depending on the measurement method employed (BIA vs. HW).
    • Gestational age appeared to influence body composition differently based on the method used.
    • This suggests that the chosen method can alter the interpretation of body composition changes during pregnancy.

    Conclusions:

    • The method used for body composition calculation during pregnancy can significantly impact findings related to gestational age.
    • Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of these discrepancies is warranted.
    • Developing accurate and reliable methods for assessing body composition in pregnant individuals is essential for understanding maternal fat changes and their impact on maternal and fetal well-being.