Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Group peer review: a questionnaire-based survey

J Beatson1, N Rushford, G Halasz

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The National Abortion Federation's 45th Annual Meeting: Together Again.

Contraception·2022
Same author

The role of advanced training in family planning and reproductive health in a low-income country; the experience of Ethiopia.

Contraception·2022
Same author

A high-fidelity, fully immersive simulation course to replicate ENT and head and neck emergencies.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2019
Same author

Semi-automatic tumour volume measurements on MR-Imaging using smartbrush<sup>®</sup> in oropharyngeal carcinomas; our experience in 5 patients.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2018
Same author

Transoral laser surgery for laryngeal carcinoma: has Steiner achieved a genuine paradigm shift in oncological surgery?

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2017
Same author

Predation and drift of lotic macroinvertebrates during colonization.

Oecologia·2017
Same journal

Cardiometabolic screening, elevated results and clinical follow-up actions in Ma-ori and non-Ma-ori with psychosis in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Author reply to Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic complexity and comorbidity: Implications for identification, outcomes, health care and involuntary treatment.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Defining and measuring psychosocial disability in Australia: Assessment of national surveys and administrative datasets.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Academic performance in children of mothers with perinatal depressive disorder.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Group peer review enhances psychiatrists' skills and professional accountability. Well-functioning groups offer educational benefits, but strategies are needed to address challenges and optimize standards.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Medical Education
  • Professional Accountability

Background:

  • Group peer review is a method for professional development and accountability in psychiatry.
  • Understanding the perceived benefits and drawbacks of group peer review is crucial for its effective implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the positive and negative aspects of group peer review among psychiatrists.
  • To assess the perceived role of group peer review in accountability procedures.
  • To identify areas for improvement in accountability through group peer review.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire-based survey was distributed to 388 psychiatrists.
  • Data collected included demographics, group details, and perceptions of group peer review's effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Responses from participants and non-participants were compared.

    • Main Results:

    • Most respondents (170) viewed peer review as vital for skill maintenance, idea sharing, constructive feedback, education, and professional accountability.
    • Non-participants agreed that peer review groups could effectively address accountability procedures.
    • Detrimental effects and operational issues within peer review groups were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Group peer review significantly contributes to professional accountability and education within effective groups.
    • Developing strategies to enhance group functioning and problem-solving is essential to maximize peer review's impact on professional standards.