Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for quality assessment in general practice

J J Rethans1, S Westin, R Hays

  • 1Centre for Research on Quality of Care in General Practice, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Family Practice
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Involving older people with multimorbidity in decision-making about their primary healthcare: A Cochrane systematic review of interventions (abridged).

Patient education and counseling·2020
Same author

ESRD in Living Donors Before 1987: Obtaining Waitlist Priority.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2017
Same author

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on blue grama growth and mycorrhizal infection.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Financial Neutrality for Living Organ Donors: Reasoning, Rationale, Definitions, and Implementation Strategies.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2016
Same author

Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: recommendations to optimize education, access, and care.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same author

A parallel-arm phase I trial of the humanised anti-IGF-1R antibody dalotuzumab in combination with the AKT inhibitor MK-2206, the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus, or the NOTCH inhibitor MK-0752, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

British journal of cancer·2014
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Effect of direct access to physiotherapy on prescribing and imaging in primary care for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Virtual and in-person interpretation: a qualitative study from the perspective of professional medical interpreters.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Temporal changes in chronic disease management in primary care in relation to telehealth policy changes: Australian whole-of-population interrupted time-series analysis.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

General practitioners can choose from various methods for quality improvement, distinguishing between assessing performance or competence and using direct or indirect data collection. Empirical data is essential for practice reflection and dialogue.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Practice Management
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • General Practice Research

Background:

  • General practitioners have diverse methods for quality assessment, assurance, and improvement.
  • These activities necessitate performance review or data collection.
  • Method selection depends on specific research questions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elaborate on key concepts for choosing quality assessment methods in general practice.
  • To distinguish between methods assessing performance versus competence.
  • To differentiate between direct (observable patient-doctor contact) and indirect methods.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of an overview frame for common data collection methods in quality assessment.
  • Discussion of methods based on validity, reliability, feasibility, and acceptability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of practical, economic, and logistic factors influencing method choice.

    • Main Results:

    • Direct methods for recording performance are considered the most valid.
    • Less ambitious methods may be favored due to practical, economic, and logistic constraints.
    • The choice of method involves trade-offs between validity and feasibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Empirical data is a crucial element for all quality assessment methods.
    • Data serves as a basis for comparisons, reflection, and professional dialogue among colleagues.
    • Effective quality improvement relies on robust data collection and collegial discussion.