Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Antihypertensive therapy: pride and prejudice

A Zanchetti1

  • 1Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Terapia Medica, Universita di Milano, Italy.

Journal of Hypertension
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

While randomized controlled trials prove antihypertensive therapy benefits, experts must avoid prejudice. Further research is needed on treatment goals, success metrics, and optimal blood pressure measurement techniques.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of the renal nerves in the control of renin synthesis during different sodium intakes in the rat.

Journal of hypertension·2001
Same author

Transient but not sustained blood pressure increments by occupational noise. An ambulatory blood pressure measurement study.

Journal of hypertension·2001
Same author

Effects of individual risk factors on the incidence of cardiovascular events in the treated hypertensive patients of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study. HOT Study Group.

Journal of hypertension·2001
Same author

Defining ambulatory and home blood pressure normality: further considerations based on data from the PAMELA study.

Journal of hypertension·2001
Same author

Impact of the Gubbio population study on community control of blood pressure and hypertension. Gubbio Study Research Group.

Journal of hypertension·2001
Same author

Risk assessment and treatment benefit in intensively treated hypertensive patients of the hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study.

Journal of hypertension·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Hypertension Management

Background:

  • Antihypertensive therapy has achieved significant successes, primarily demonstrated through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • However, an overreliance on RCTs may lead to prejudice, overlooking other valid research methodologies and practical treatment considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the limitations of current antihypertensive treatment research and practice.
  • To highlight areas requiring further investigation, including treatment goals, outcome measures, and blood pressure monitoring techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing clinical trial methodologies in hypertension research.
  • Discussion of the gap between trial results and clinical practice.
  • Examination of different trial designs (event-based vs. organ damage-based) and their relevance.

Main Results:

  • RCTs, while essential, may overestimate or underestimate treatment benefits and do not represent the sole valid methodology.
  • Current guidelines emphasize absolute risk and benefit, but earlier treatment of milder hypertension may be more effective.
  • Optimal methods for blood pressure measurement for treatment decisions remain unclear.

Conclusions:

  • Hypertension experts must move beyond prejudice by acknowledging the limitations of current methodologies.
  • Future research should incorporate diverse trial designs and focus on practical aspects like blood pressure measurement.
  • A balanced approach is needed to refine antihypertensive strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos