Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current-based transthoracic defibrillation

R E Kerber1, R A Kieso, M G Kienzle

  • 1University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, USA.

The American Journal of Cardiology
|November 15, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Transient immediate orthostatic hypotension' is preferable to 'initial' orthostatic hypotension.

Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical·2025
Same author

Relationships among owner consideration of euthanasia, caregiver burden, and treatment satisfaction in canine osteoarthritis.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2022
Same author

Reducing occupational distress in veterinary medicine personnel with acceptance and commitment training: a pilot study.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2021
Same author

Predicting caregiver burden in general veterinary clients: Contribution of companion animal clinical signs and problem behaviors.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2018
Same author

Tachycardia-induced ventricular dysfunction jigsaw: do all pieces now fit?

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2016
Same author

[New therapeutic approaches in 2014 in pulmonary medicine: COPD, asthma and lung fibrosis].

Revue medicale suisse·2015
Same journal

Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Octogenarian Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the PARACHUTER Study.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

ECG-Guided Conduction Pathways as a Lever to Shorten Post-TAVI Hospitalization.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Cystatin-C versus creatinine and kidney function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a SOGALDI-PEF analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Balloon-expandable versus Self-expanding Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annuli Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents following Coronary Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Prehospital Statin Therapy and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Current-based defibrillation is feasible and effective for treating ventricular arrhythmias like ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). While not definitively superior to energy-based methods in this study, it shows promise for future cardiac resuscitation protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Transthoracic defibrillation is a critical intervention for life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Current-based defibrillation offers a potential alternative to traditional energy-based approaches.
  • Optimizing defibrillation parameters is essential for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of current-based transthoracic defibrillation.
  • To compare the success rates of current-based shocks versus energy-based shocks for various ventricular arrhythmias.
  • To investigate the impact of transthoracic impedance on defibrillation efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, multicenter trial involving 362 patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administration of current-based shocks (18-40 A) and energy-based shocks (100-300 J).
  • Custom defibrillators determined impedance using a "test-pulse" technique prior to shock delivery.

    • Main Results:

    • Current-based shocks of 35/40 A achieved up to 74% success for VF/polymorphic VT; 30 A shocks terminated 88% of monomorphic VT.
    • Energy-based shocks of 300 J terminated 72% of VF/polymorphic VT; 200 J shocks terminated 89% of monomorphic VT.
    • No significant increase in success rate for current-based shocks in patients with high transthoracic impedance was demonstrated, potentially due to sample size.

    Conclusions:

    • Current-based transthoracic defibrillation is clinically feasible and effective for managing ventricular arrhythmias.
    • Further investigation in larger studies is required to determine if current-based defibrillation offers superior efficacy compared to energy-based methods.
    • The findings support the continued development and evaluation of current-based defibrillation technologies.