Related Experiment Videos
Helical CT in the examination of bile duct obstruction
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Central Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Insights
Helical CT is effective for diagnosing cholestasis when ultrasound (US) is inconclusive. It accurately identifies gallstones and suggests tumoral obstructions when the cause is unclear.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Cholestasis, characterized by bile duct obstruction, requires accurate diagnosis for effective management.
- Ultrasound (US) is a common initial imaging modality, but its diagnostic accuracy for cholestasis can be limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of helical computed tomography (CT) in identifying the causes of cholestasis.
- To compare helical CT findings with ultrasound (US) in patients with confirmed bile duct obstruction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of US and helical CT reports in 36 patients with bile duct obstruction.
- Helical CT utilized 3-mm or 5-mm slices with 1-mm or 2-mm spacing after contrast administration.
- 2-D reformatted images were used to visualize the entire length of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Main Results:
- Helical CT correctly diagnosed choledochal stones in 71% of cases, compared to 14% for US.
- Tumoral obstruction diagnosis accuracy was 44% for CT versus 28% for US.
- Helical CT with 2-D reformats aided in assessing the nature and extent of obstruction, particularly when US was inconclusive.
Conclusions:
- Helical CT, especially with 2-D reformats, is a valuable tool for diagnosing cholestasis when US is insufficient.
- It offers high confidence in visualizing impacted gallstones and can suggest tumoral obstruction when the cause is not directly visualized.
Purpose:
To assess the role of helical CT in the examination of cholestasis.
Material And Methods:
The US and CT reports of 36 consecutive patients with confirmed bile duct obstruction were evaluated in retrospect, the given diagnoses were compared with each other, and the final diagnoses confirmed by ERCP, surgery, fine needle or endoscopic biopsy, or autopsy. The bile duct was evaluated from helical 3-mm or 5-mm images reconstructed with 1-mm or 2-mm spacings, respectively, obtained after a bolus injection of 140 ml contrast medium containing 300 mg I/ml. Cross-section images and 2-D reformats displaying the extrahepatic bile duct in its full length were recorded for the interpretation.
Results:
An obstruction secondary to a choledochal gall stone was present in 14 patients, a tumoral obstruction in 18, a post-inflammatory stricture in 2, and chronic pancreatitis in one patient. In one patient the obstruction present at US was over at CT. A choledochal stone was correctly diagnosed at US in 14% and at CT in 71% of the cases. A correct tumor diagnosis was achieved in 28% and 44% of the cases, respectively. Benign and malignant bile duct wall involvement could not be reliably discriminated. The 2-D display was of significant value in assessing the nature and extent of the obstructive agent.
Conclusion:
Helical CT supplemented with 2-D reformats was a useful method in the cases of cholestasis where US failed to demonstrate the cause of obstruction. An impacted stone can be visualized with high confidence while a tumoral obstruction is to be suspected when the cause of blockage is not directly visible.