Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
When more of a good thing is better: reply to Hayes et al. (1996)
1Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA. wbstiles@miamiu.muohio.edu
Abstract:
More of a good process component is better when clients are not already getting enough. Process components may be in short supply because of limited resources or ignorance, because they are evaluations themselves, or because they are difficult-to-attain subgoals on the way to valued outcomes. Levels of crucially important process components that are not in short supply (including most commonly used therapeutic interventions) are unlikely to be statistical predictors of outcome. Conversely, then, null correlations with outcome do not impugn a component's therapeutic importance. Many of A.M. Hayes, L.G. Castonguay, and M.R. Goldfried's (1996b) examples of positive correlations usefully illustrated clients' cognitive and emotional processes that were treatment subgoals or evaluative indexes. However, by focusing on the (relatively rare) positive correlations, they overlooked the more common null or inconsistent correlations of theoretically important process components with outcome, which are the central topic of the responsiveness critique.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

