Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods

Z Yang1

  • 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing Agricultural University, China.

Journal of Molecular Evolution
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Substitution rate variation among sites in mitochondrial hypervariable region I of humans and chimpanzees.

Molecular biology and evolution·1999
Same author

Chromosome 9 monosomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization of bladder irrigation specimens is predictive of tumor recurrence.

The Journal of urology·1999
Same author

Effects of early eschar excision en masse at one operation for prevention and treatment of organ dysfunction in severely burned patients.

World journal of surgery·1999
Same author

Kinesin-II is required for axonal transport of choline acetyltransferase in Drosophila.

The Journal of cell biology·1999
Same author

What makes the circadian clock tick: genes that keep time?

Recent progress in hormone research·1999
Same author

Opposite effects of pH on open-state probability and single channel conductance of kir4.1 channels.

The Journal of physiology·1999
Same journal

Sensing Underwater: Diversifying Selection, Convergent Evolution and Inactivation in Sensory Receptors' Genes of Aquatic Mammals.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Synonymous Codons as Potential Contributors to Chromatin Stability and Gene Body Methylation in Plants.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Convergent Functional Genomic Evolution Underlying Repeated Freshwater Colonization in Cetaceans.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Lineage-Specific Diversification of Nucleoporin Nup98 Genes in Ciliates and Its Evolutionary Implications for the Nuclear Dualism.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution: The Influence of Partitioning, Calibration, and Gene Heterogeneity on Pleurodontan Substitution Rates.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
See all related articles

Maximum-parsimony (MP) phylogenetic tree reconstruction relies on strict evolutionary assumptions. The likelihood method is preferred for complex sequence evolution, though efficient tree topology estimation remains challenging.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic tree reconstruction aims to infer evolutionary relationships.
  • Maximum-parsimony (MP) is a widely used method for inferring phylogenetic trees.
  • Understanding the assumptions and limitations of MP is crucial for accurate evolutionary inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To intuitively examine and computationally corroborate the assumptions of the maximum-parsimony method.
  • To compare the performance of MP with the likelihood method under various models of sequence evolution.
  • To assess the suitability of MP for reconstructing phylogenetic trees from complex biological sequences.

Main Methods:

  • Intuitive examination of maximum-parsimony assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Computer simulations to test phylogenetic tree reconstruction methods.
  • Evaluation of MP and likelihood methods under hierarchical models of nucleotide substitution.

    • Main Results:

    • MP imposes stringent assumptions, including rate constancy across sites and lineages (molecular clock).
    • MP performance degrades with more complex and realistic models of nucleotide substitution.
    • The likelihood method generally outperforms MP when evolutionary processes deviate from simple models.

    Conclusions:

    • The likelihood method is preferable to MP for reconstructing phylogenetic trees from complex sequence data.
    • MP's stringent assumptions limit its accuracy in realistic evolutionary scenarios.
    • Developing statistically robust methods for phylogenetic tree topology estimation remains an open research problem.