Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Health screening, development, and equity

P Braveman1, E Tarimo

  • 1Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco 94143-0900, USA.

Journal of Public Health Policy
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Screening decisions must consider societal impact and equity, not just individual health. Prioritizing primary prevention and public education is often more effective and equitable than widespread screening programs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defining equity in health.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2003
Same author

Measuring socioeconomic status/position in studies of racial/ethnic disparities: maternal and infant health.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2002
Same author

The relationship of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics to birthweight among 5 ethnic groups in California.

American journal of public health·2001
Same author

World Health Report 2000: how it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000.

Lancet (London, England)·2001
Same author

Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California.

Maternal and child health journal·2001

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Policy
  • Health Economics
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Policy-makers globally face decisions on implementing health screening programs.
  • Technological advancements and economic interests heavily influence screening adoption.
  • Existing ethical frameworks for screening may not adequately address development and equity concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the broader implications of introducing health screening into routine services.
  • To evaluate screening's impact on primary prevention and resource allocation.
  • To examine screening's potential effects on health equity, particularly in developing countries.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on screening policy, ethics, and economics.
  • Analysis of the interplay between screening, primary prevention, and public health strategies.
  • Consideration of equity and resource allocation challenges in diverse healthcare settings.

Main Results:

  • Screening can divert resources and attention from essential primary prevention efforts.
  • Public education for self-referral may be more effective for certain conditions than mass screening.
  • Screening implementation carries risks of resource waste and exacerbated health inequities, especially in developing nations.

Conclusions:

  • Screening policy decisions require a broader ethical and societal perspective beyond individual-focused frameworks.
  • Prioritizing primary prevention and accessible healthcare services is crucial for public health.
  • Careful consideration of resource allocation and equity is essential when evaluating the adoption of new screening technologies.

Related Experiment Videos