2,3,7,8-TCDD induces cytochrome P450 enzyme activity but not proliferation or phenotypical changes in human...

In contrast to the well documented immunosuppressive effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in experimental animals, the impact of dioxin on the human immune system remains controversial, although adverse health effects have been reported in humans accidentally or occupationally exposed to dioxin. More recently, a dose-dependent decrease of specific subpopulations of mitogen-activated human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), including helper-inducer/memory cells (CD4+CD29+) and B cells (CD20+), was reported after in vitro treatment with dioxin concentrations as low as 10(-12)-10(-14) M TCDD [1]. Therefore, the direct effects of dioxin on human PBL subpopulations have been studied in more detail, in order to assess the availability of a sensitive indicator system for human dioxin exposure. PBL from healthy volunteers were stimulated with pokeweed mitogen (PWM) or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) and treated with 10(-7)-10(-14) M TCDD for 3-4 days. Cytochrome P450 (CYP1A1) enzyme induction was determined by the ethoxy-resorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay. Percentages of the different lymphocytes subsets, including CD2 (T cells), CD4, CD45 RA (suppressor-inducer/ virgin T cells), CD4, CD29, CD8, CD19 (B cells), as well as interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor (CD25) and class II antigen (human leukocyte antigen HLA-DR) expression, were analyzed by flow cytometry. The proliferative activity was determined by 3H-thymidine uptake after 3-4 days of culture. In the present study, all stimulated lymphocyte cultures showed a significant increase of CYP1A1 activity at dioxin concentrations of 10(-7) and 10(-9) M. In contrast, alterations in surface antigen expression or suppression of proliferative responses did not occur in the mitogen-activated PBL over the whole concentration range of TCDD. These results clearly demonstrate that lymphoproliferation, as well as phenotypes of human PBL, are not affected by dioxin treatment and thus are not useful as sensitive biomarkers in human exposure studies.