Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Adjusting for bias in C/E ratio estimates

A A Stinnett

    Health Economics
    |September 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary

    The incremental cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratio estimator is biased in small samples. Bootstrap methods can correct this bias when patient-level data is available, improving cost-effectiveness analysis accuracy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cost-effective use of nevirapine to prevent vertical HIV transmission in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2000
    Same author

    An economic evaluation of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the outpatient treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

    The American journal of managed care·2000
    Same author

    Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics.

    Annals of internal medicine·2000
    Same author

    At what price significance? The effect of price estimates on statistical inference in economic evaluation.

    Health economics·1999
    Same author

    Ratio-based and net benefit-based approaches to health care resource allocation: proofs of optimality and equivalence.

    Health economics·1999
    Same author

    Is it really so bad to be unambiguously inefficient? The role of dominance in stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1999
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Health economics
    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical trial analysis

    Background:

    • Incremental cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratios are crucial for healthcare decision-making.
    • Estimating C/E ratios from sampled data can introduce statistical bias.
    • Bias in C/E ratio estimation is particularly concerning in small sample studies.

    Discussion:

    • The standard estimator for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) is statistically biased, though consistent.
    • This bias can be significant in analyses with limited patient-level data.
    • Bootstrap simulation offers a viable method to quantify and adjust for this bias.

    Key Insights:

    • The C/E ratio estimator's bias is sample-size dependent.
    • Bootstrap methods provide a robust approach to correct C/E ratio point estimates.
    • Accurate C/E ratio estimation is vital for reliable health economic evaluations.

    Outlook:

    • Further research should explore the performance of bootstrap adjustments across diverse healthcare interventions.
    • Developing standardized guidelines for bias correction in C/E ratio analysis is recommended.
    • Improved C/E ratio estimation will enhance resource allocation in healthcare systems.

    Related Experiment Videos