Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human population variability in relative dental development

R L Tompkins1

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131, USA.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relative dental development of Upper Pleistocene hominids compared to human population variation.

American journal of physical anthropology·1996
Same author

La Ferrassie 6 and the development of Neandertal pubic morphology.

American journal of physical anthropology·1987
Same author

Group B beta-hemolytic streptococcal meningitis in mother and infant.

The New England journal of medicine·1974
Same author

Zoster immune globulin for chickenpox prevention.

California medicine·1970

Dental X-rays reveal population-specific differences in tooth development timing. These variations in relative dental development contribute to population differences in tooth eruption ages.

Area of Science:

  • Anthropology
  • Human Biology
  • Paleodontology

Background:

  • Dental development patterns exhibit variation across different human populations.
  • Understanding these variations is crucial for interpreting fossil evidence and modern human diversity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the relative calcification timing of various teeth across distinct populations: Black Southern Africans, White French-Canadians, and Prehistoric Native Americans.
  • To investigate the contribution of relative dental development to population-specific tooth eruption age differences.

Main Methods:

  • Dental X-rays were utilized to assess the calcification stages of multiple teeth.
  • A "reference tooth" was used to standardize comparisons across individuals and populations.
  • Specific teeth analyzed included M3, M2, mandibular canines, and mandibular central incisors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • French-Canadians showed delayed M3 development relative to Africans and delayed M2 development relative to both Africans and Native Americans.
  • Mandibular canine development showed no sex difference between African and French-Canadian males, but French-Canadian females were advanced compared to African females.
  • Prehistoric Native Americans potentially exhibited delayed mandibular central incisor development compared to French-Canadians.

Conclusions:

  • Population differences in relative dental development are a significant factor influencing population differences in tooth eruption ages.
  • The study supports existing research on dental development variability among African, European, and Native American groups.
  • Two hypotheses regarding the drivers of this variability were proposed: jaw space availability and differential timing of dental/skeletal development.