Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing whether to perform a confirmatory randomized clinical trial

M K Parmar1, R S Ungerleider, R Simon

  • 1Medical Research Council, Cancer Trials Office, Cambridge, U.K.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|November 20, 1996
PubMed
Summary

A new statistical framework helps decide if confirmatory randomized clinical trials are needed. It uses Bayesian methods to incorporate prior beliefs and assess treatment effect skepticism, aiding trial decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Platinum versus platinum-combination chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis using individual patient data.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2013
Same author

Initial toxicity assessment of ICON6: a randomised trial of cediranib plus chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.

British journal of cancer·2011
Same author

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not (yet) standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2001
Same author

Monitoring of large randomised clinical trials: a new approach with Bayesian methods.

Lancet (London, England)·2001
Same author

Accelerated radiotherapy vs. chemoradiation in non-small cell lung cancer: quantifying the hazards.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2001
Same author

Preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2000

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Confirmatory randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assess previously observed treatment effects.
  • Disagreement often exists regarding the necessity of confirmatory RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a statistical framework for determining the need for confirmatory trials.
  • To provide a systematic approach for evaluating confirmatory trial necessity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian framework to analyze results from two clinical trials (lung and colon cancer).
  • Incorporated prior beliefs about treatment efficacy as prior distributions.
  • Developed a model to yield posterior distributions based on trial data and prior beliefs.
  • Advocated for specifying a minimum clinically worthwhile treatment effect at trial initiation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Differences in interpreting RCT results stem from varying prior beliefs.
  • Prior skepticism significantly influences the decision to conduct confirmatory trials.
  • The Bayesian model systematically examines how prior beliefs affect interpretation and the need for confirmatory trials.

Conclusions:

  • Acknowledges diverse prior beliefs leading to varied interpretations of RCT results.
  • Offers a formal basis for assessing the range of opinions and deciding on confirmatory trials.
  • Recommends this systematic approach for future confirmatory RCT discussions.