Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Pressure sore risk calculators: some methodological issues

Journal of Clinical Nursing

|September 1, 1996

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simulation modelling as a tool to guide control strategies for foot and mouth disease in an endemic country: Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia 2023-2024.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2026

Same author

Retrospective stepwise prioritization of chemicals detected in Great Lakes tributaries (2008-2018).

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025

Same author

Common Radiological Features on Chest X-Rays of Infants With Bronchiolitis: Do They Support Management?

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2025

Same author

Biallelic EPCAM deletions induce tissue-specific DNA repair deficiency and cancer predisposition.

NPJ precision oncology·2024

Same author

Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes: author reply.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2023

Same author

Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models.

BMC surgery·2023

Same journal

Comment on 'Latent Profile Analysis of Preoperative Frailty in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Implications for Individualised Nursing Care'.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

Same journal

Catheter-Day Denominators in CVADs Care Bundles Studies: Does a Reduction in Infection Events Indicate Reduced Risk?

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

Same journal

A Scoping Review of Malnutrition Risk Prediction Models in Cancer Patients.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

Same journal

Health Literacy and Unmet Needs in Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanistic Interpretations and Practice Implications.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

Same journal

Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Pain and Patient Satisfaction During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

Same journal

Nursing's Contribution to Patient Rehabilitation Following Spinal Cord Injury: An Integrative Review.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026

See all related articles

Pressure sore risk calculators are widely used but may lack reliability and validity. This study highlights methodological concerns, questioning their role in guiding patient care and future research directions.

Area of Science:

Medical devices
Clinical assessment tools
Patient safety research

Background:

Pressure sore risk calculators are integral to prevention and management strategies.
Concerns exist regarding the reliability and validity of these widely used tools.
Current evidence suggests limitations in their ability to accurately predict risk.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the methodological issues surrounding pressure sore risk calculators.
To address the debate on the extent to which these calculators should direct clinical care.
To inform future research directions in pressure sore risk assessment.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on pressure sore risk calculator reliability and validity.
Analysis of methodological challenges in calculator development and application.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of implications for clinical practice and research.

Main Results:

Significant doubts exist regarding the high levels of reliability and validity of current risk calculators.
Methodological weaknesses may impact the accuracy and consistency of risk assessments.
The direct application of calculator scores to guide care requires careful consideration.

Conclusions:

Further investigation into the methodological rigor of pressure sore risk calculators is warranted.
The clinical utility of these tools may be limited by current reliability and validity concerns.
Future research should focus on improving the accuracy and clinical relevance of pressure sore risk assessment tools.