A comparison of slit-lamp supported versus hand-held biometry

Biometry allows determination of the final refractive outcome following cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. We compared the accuracy of axial length measurement performed with the slit-lamp supported biometry probe versus a hand-held technique. The two methods of biometry were performed on 32 patients undergoing endocapsular cataract extraction with lens implantation. One of the methods was selected at random in order to predict implant power for a desired refractive outcome using the SRK-T formula. There was no difference in 'within-subject' variance of axial length measurement between the two methods (t = 1.74, p = 0.091), and there was no difference in refractive outcome when the power calculations for the two techniques were compared (t = 0.12, p = 0.906). The hand-held technique provides a useful alternative method of biometry in 'difficult' patients.