Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interocular differences in visual function in normal subjects

J M Wood1, M A Bullimore

  • 1Centre for Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What factors are associated with food security among recently arrived refugees resettling in high-income countries? A scoping review.

Public health nutrition·2021
Same author

The effects of auditory satellite navigation instructions and visual blur on road hazard perception.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2019
Same author

Does gene expression in laryngeal subsites differ between patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and controls?

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2017
Same author

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: an otolaryngologist's perspective.

British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005)·2017
Same author

Therapeutic potential of NADPH oxidase 1/4 inhibitors.

British journal of pharmacology·2016
Same author

The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2015

This study defines normal visual symmetry between eyes for clinical testing. Significant differences in visual acuity, contrast, and motion sensitivity indicate potential visual impairment.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Clinical Vision Science

Background:

  • Clinical assessment often compares visual function between eyes, assuming symmetry.
  • This assumption is critical for diagnosing unilateral or asymmetric visual diseases.
  • Age-related changes in visual symmetry are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify normal interocular symmetry for key clinical visual function tests.
  • To establish thresholds for abnormal interocular differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and motion sensitivity.
  • To investigate the influence of age on visual interocular symmetry.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed high and low contrast visual acuity, letter contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson Chart), and motion sensitivity (Dmin).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested 91 subjects aged 21-82 years, measuring visual function in both eyes.
  • Analyzed interocular differences and their distribution across age groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Interocular differences for all tests followed a Gaussian distribution.
    • Abnormal high contrast visual acuity defined by >0.16 logMAR difference; low contrast by >0.17 logMAR.
    • Abnormal Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity >0.23 log CS; Dmin motion sensitivity >0.35 log minarc.
    • Low contrast visual acuity showed increased interocular difference with age, but asymmetry remained stable for other measures.

    Conclusions:

    • Established normative interocular difference thresholds for clinical visual function tests.
    • Age impacts low contrast visual acuity symmetry, but not significantly for other tested visual functions.
    • Findings provide crucial benchmarks for identifying abnormal visual function in clinical practice.