Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direct comparison of three methods for predicting digoxin concentrations

P J Williams1, J R Lane, E V Capparelli

  • 1Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California 95211, USA.

Pharmacotherapy
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeted inhibition of mu-opioid receptors in neuronal subpopulations by membrane-tethered Naloxo-DART antagonists.

Cell chemical biology·2025
Same author

Phononic bath engineering of a superconducting qubit.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Piezoacoustics for precision control of electrons floating on helium.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

Comparison of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block catheter technique with surgical pre-peritoneal catheter for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Haemodynamic effects of parenteral vs. enteral paracetamol in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Hydrochemical profiles in urban groundwater systems: New insights into contaminant sources and pathways in the subsurface from legacy and emerging contaminants.

The Science of the total environment·2016
Same journal

Comment on "Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis".

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Response to Comment on "Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis".

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Multiple Doses of Itraconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of Zongertinib in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Menopausal Hormone Therapy: A Narrative Review of Contemporary Evidence.

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Getting It Right the Second Time: How Can we Optimize First-Generation Cephalosporin Dosing for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the 21st Century?

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

Buprenorphine Initiation During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decreases Sedative and Opioid Exposure: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.

Pharmacotherapy·2026
See all related articles

Method III accurately predicted digoxin levels in all patient groups, outperforming other methods. This pharmacokinetic analysis aids in optimizing drug dosing for patients, including those with heart failure or taking quinidine.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) is crucial for therapeutic drug monitoring.
  • Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling offers a framework for understanding drug variability.
  • Evaluating different PopPK methods is essential for clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive performance of three distinct methods for determining digoxin population pharmacokinetic parameters.
  • To assess the bias and precision of these methods across different patient subpopulations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized NONMEM software (version IV) for PopPK analysis of 118 SDCs from 49 patients.
  • Employed maximum likelihood techniques and graphic observation of weighted residuals (WRES) for prediction error analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted parallel analyses on subpopulations with and without quinidine and congestive heart failure (CHF).

    • Main Results:

    • Method III demonstrated no bias across all studied subpopulations and exhibited the smallest WRES.
    • Method I showed no bias overall but underpredicted SDCs in patients receiving quinidine or with CHF.
    • Method II underpredicted SDCs in the overall population, those on quinidine, and patients without CHF.

    Conclusions:

    • Method III is the most robust and unbiased approach for predicting digoxin concentrations in diverse patient populations.
    • The choice of PopPK method significantly impacts prediction accuracy, particularly in specific clinical scenarios.
    • Findings support the use of Method III for improved digoxin therapeutic drug monitoring.