Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are convenience DNA samples significantly different?

W K Fung1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Forensic Science International
|October 25, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Liver X receptor alpha ensures blood-brain barrier function by suppressing SNAI2.

Cell death & disease·2023
Same author

Population pharmacokinetics of alcohol on Chinese subjects using breath measures.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2010
Same author

A simple method for detection of imprinting effects based on case-parents trios.

Heredity·2006
Same author

Alcohol metabolism of local Chinese in Hong Kong: a statistical determination on the effects of various physiological factors.

Forensic science international·2006
Same author

Influence curves for factor loadings.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2005
Same author

Population data for the Identifier 15 STR loci in Hong Kong Chinese.

Forensic science international·2005
Same journal

Insights from the first synthetic cannabinoid clandestine lab dismantled in Brazil.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Determination of the new psychoactive substances MDMB-4en-PINACA, ADB-BUTINACA and some of their metabolites in blood and urine using DLLE-LC-MS/MS: application to real forensic case samples.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

The revolver halo as a forensic marker: Raman spectroscopic evidence of primer-driven gunshot residue deposition.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Research on the effects of signature size on experts' opinions.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Experimental and numerical study of non-penetrating FMJ ballistic impacts on coupled soft and bone tissue surrogates.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Limitations of inkjet and spot amino acid targets for fingermark reagent research and monitoring - and some observations.

Forensic science international·2026
See all related articles

Statistical analysis of DNA databases reveals that convenience sampling methods do not significantly alter DNA profile frequencies. This finding supports the reliability of VNTR reference databases for forensic applications.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Population Genetics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • DNA databases are crucial for forensic identification.
  • Convenience sampling is often used for database collection.
  • Potential biases from sampling methods require statistical evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically investigate if DNA databases differ based on convenience sampling methods.
  • To test the null hypothesis of identical population frequency distributions across sampling methods.
  • To assess the reliability of VNTR reference databases.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of single-locus VNTR databases from the Hong Kong Government Laboratory.
  • Application of bootstrap and Monte Carlo simulation techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized significance tests: Pearson's chi-squared, likelihood ratio, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample statistics.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistical tests yielded probability values below the 5% significance level.
    • Insufficient evidence was found to reject the null hypothesis.
    • The observed DNA profile frequencies are consistent across different convenience sampling methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Convenience sampling methods do not introduce statistically significant differences in DNA databases.
    • Increased confidence in the validity of VNTR reference databases collected via convenience sampling.
    • Supports the continued use of these databases in forensic science.