Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Slow-binding inhibition: the general case

M J Sculley1, J F Morrison, W W Cleland

  • 1Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta
|November 14, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optical properties of cigarette smoke aerosols.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

A heavy-atom isotope effect and kinetic investigation of the hydrolysis of semicarbazide by urease from jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis).

Biochemistry·2008
Same author

Asymptotic scaling in turbulent pipe flow.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2007
Same author

Multiple isotope effect study of the hydrolysis of formamide by urease from jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis).

Biochemistry·2006
Same author

Multiple isotope effect study of the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of formamide.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2006
Same author

Multiple isotope effect study of the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of methyl formate.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2005
Same journal

Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

Molecular Basis of Disease Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

General Subjects Cumulative Contents.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2020
Same journal

Erratum to 'on the role of exchangeable hydrogen bonds for the kinetics of P680<sup>+·</sup> Q<sub>A</sub> <sup>-·</sup> formation and P680<sup>+·</sup> Pheo<sup>-·</sup> recombination in photosystem II' [Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1276 (1996) 35-44].

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
Same journal

Oligomeric state of the light-harvesting complexes B800-850 and B875 from purple bacterium Rubrivivax gelatinosus in detergent solution.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
Same journal

Regulation of pigment content and enzyme activity in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. Mac grown in continuous light, a light-dark photoperiod, or darkness.

Biochimica et biophysica acta·2019
See all related articles

Distinguishing between slow-binding enzyme inhibition mechanisms (A and B) is challenging. Analyzing kinetic data reveals potential errors in parameter values when fitting to simplified models, highlighting the complexity of enzyme kinetics.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Enzyme kinetics

Background:

  • Slow-binding inhibition is crucial in enzyme-catalyzed reactions.
  • Two primary mechanisms, A and B, describe inhibitor-enzyme interactions.
  • A more general form of Mechanism B assumes steady-state equilibrium.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if steady-state kinetic techniques can differentiate between three potential slow-binding enzyme inhibition mechanisms.
  • To investigate the challenges in identifying the most general inhibition mechanism.

Main Methods:

  • Deriving theoretical data for the most general mechanism.
  • Utilizing three different ratios for rate constants to define mechanism applicability.
  • Fitting progress curve data to rate equations of other mechanisms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experimental data fitting can be difficult to definitively assign to the most general mechanism.
  • Parameter values derived from fitting to Mechanisms A and B can be significantly inaccurate.
  • The study highlights the limitations of current kinetic techniques for precise mechanism determination.

Conclusions:

  • Differentiating between slow-binding enzyme inhibition mechanisms using steady-state kinetics presents significant challenges.
  • Inaccurate kinetic parameter estimations can arise from applying simplified models.
  • Further development of kinetic analysis methods is needed for robust mechanism identification.