Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nasal defects and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience

R D Nishimura1, E Roumanas, P K Moy

  • 1University of California, Los Angeles, School of Dentistry, USA.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Craniofacial implants in nasal defects show a 71.4% success rate, with anterior nasal floor sites performing significantly better than glabella sites. Most soft tissue responses were healthy, indicating good implant integration.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and patterns of cutaneous manifestations in 1245 COVID-19 patients in Japan: a single-centre study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2022
Same author

Prevalence of early and late oral implant loss among smokers: a nationwide survey in Japan.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

A case of non-bullous pemphigoid induced by IgG4 autoantibodies targeting BP230.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Gastrointestinal: Discordant lymphoma consisting of ileal follicular lymphoma and colonic mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2019
Same author

Gastrointestinal: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of mesenteric veins.

Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology·2018
Same author

The first familial cases of epidermolysis bullosa simplex, generalized severe with p.Asn176Ser in KRT5 revealing the clinical chronology.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2016

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Nasal defects present significant reconstructive challenges.
  • Craniofacial implants offer a stable anchor for nasal prostheses.
  • Evaluating implant success and soft tissue response is crucial for optimizing outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the success rate of craniofacial implants in nasal defects.
  • To analyze implant survival based on anatomical location.
  • To evaluate peri-implant soft tissue health over time.

Main Methods:

  • A 7-year clinical study involving 23 craniofacial implants in 11 patients with nasal defects.
  • Implant success rates and soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Peri-implant soft tissues were assessed using a five-point scale for inflammation and health.

    • Main Results:

    • An overall implant success rate of 71.4% (15/21) was observed.
    • Success rates varied significantly by site: 0% in the glabella vs. 88.1% in the anterior nasal floor.
    • 85.5% of evaluated sites showed no inflammation; severe soft tissue reactions were rare, especially in the anterior nasal floor.

    Conclusions:

    • Craniofacial implants can be successfully used for nasal defect reconstruction.
    • Anatomical site is a critical factor influencing implant success in the nose.
    • Good to excellent soft tissue health is generally maintained around nasal implants, particularly in the anterior nasal floor.