Related Experiment Videos
A comparison of two spider fear questionnaires
1Department of Psychology, Limburg University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
|September 1, 1996
Summary
This study compared the Fear of Spiders Questionnaire (FSQ) and Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ). Both effectively measured spider fear, but the FSQ offered superior measurement in non-phobic individuals and captured fear of harm.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Specific phobias, like arachnophobia, significantly impact quality of life.
- Self-report measures are crucial for assessing the severity and nature of specific fears.
- Comparing the psychometric properties of different assessment tools is essential for clinical utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the psychometric properties of the Fear of Spiders Questionnaire (FSQ) and the Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ).
- To evaluate the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of both measures in assessing spider fear.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted to assess psychometric properties.
- Methods included evaluating test-retest stability, internal consistency, ability to differentiate between phobic and non-phobic groups, and correlation with other fear indices.
- Therapeutic change was assessed using both questionnaires.
Main Results:
- Both the FSQ and SPQ demonstrated adequate test-retest stability and internal consistency.
- Both instruments successfully differentiated between individuals with and without spider phobia.
- Both measures were sensitive to therapeutic changes and correlated with other subjective and behavioral indicators of spider fear.
Conclusions:
- The FSQ and SPQ are reliable and valid instruments for measuring spider fear.
- The FSQ may be superior for assessing fear in individuals not meeting full phobic criteria.
- The FSQ captures a distinct dimension of spider fear, specifically the fear of harm, providing additional clinical information.