Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Affective learning: awareness and aversion

A O Hamm1, D Vaitl

  • 1Department of Clinical and Physiological Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany.

Psychophysiology
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural substrates of long-term item and source memory for emotional associates: An fMRI study.

Neuropsychologia·2020
Same author

Brain imaging of chill reactions to pleasant and unpleasant sounds.

Behavioural brain research·2019
Same author

Characterizing the nature of emotional-associative learning deficits in panic disorder: An fMRI study on fear conditioning, extinction training and recall.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2018
Same author

A functional genetic variation of SLC6A2 repressor hsa-miR-579-3p upregulates sympathetic noradrenergic processes of fear and anxiety.

Translational psychiatry·2018
Same author

Assessing the interplay of childhood adversities with more recent stressful life events and conditions in predicting panic pathology among adults from the general population.

Journal of affective disorders·2017
Same author

MAOA gene hypomethylation in panic disorder-reversibility of an epigenetic risk pattern by psychotherapy.

Translational psychiatry·2016
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Aversive learning enhances startle responses during Pavlovian conditioning, even without conscious awareness. Skin conductance conditioning requires awareness of stimulus relationships, unlike startle reflexes.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Pavlovian conditioning is a fundamental learning process.
  • Understanding how different reinforcers influence conditioned responses is crucial.
  • Awareness of stimulus contingencies may modulate learning and response systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of aversive and nonaversive reinforcers on startle reactivity, visceral responses, and self-report.
  • To assess the role of awareness in conditioned discrimination across different response systems.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies employed Pavlovian conditioning paradigms.
  • Measured startle response, skin conductance, and cardiac activity.
  • Assessed participants' awareness of stimulus contingencies via postconditioning recognition tests.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Conditioned startle potentiation was specific to aversive learning contexts.
  • Blink potentiation occurred irrespective of awareness of the conditioned-unconditioned stimulus relationship.
  • Skin conductance conditioning depended on awareness of the stimulus contingency.
  • Cardiac responses showed variability related to task demands and individual stereotypes.

Conclusions:

  • Startle responses are sensitive to the aversive nature of learning, occurring even without explicit awareness.
  • Visceral responses like skin conductance require cognitive awareness of stimulus contingencies for conditioning.
  • Response systems differ in their susceptibility to awareness and reinforcer valence during conditioning.