Partial matching in the Moses illusion: response bias not sensitivity

E N Kamas1, L M Reder, M S Ayers

  • 1Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Memory & Cognition
|November 1, 1996
PubMed

Insights

The Moses illusion, where people miss errors like "Moses" instead of "Noah" on the Ark, is not due to word-level matching. Our findings suggest this cognitive illusion operates at a deeper, feature-detection level.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Perception
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The Moses illusion demonstrates difficulty in detecting semantic distortions in questions.
  • Previous research proposed a word-level partial-match process as the cause.
  • Some studies suggested focusing on specific words could reduce the Moses illusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanism of the Moses illusion.
  • To challenge the word-level partial-match hypothesis.
  • To determine if the illusion operates at a sub-word level.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design to test participants' ability to detect distortions.
  • Analysis of response criteria and detection abilities.
  • Focus on sub-word feature processing.

Main Results:

  • Previous conclusions about the Moses illusion were based on response shifts, not improved detection.
  • The data indicate no change in the ability to detect distortions with focused attention.
  • Evidence suggests the matching process operates at the distinctive feature level, below word recognition.

Conclusions:

  • The Moses illusion is not solely a word-level phenomenon.
  • Cognitive matching processes involved in the Moses illusion occur at the distinctive feature level.
  • Response criterion shifts can mask true detection abilities in cognitive tasks.

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.