Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Causal inference from indirect experiments

J Pearl1

  • 1Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles 90024, USA.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TETRAD and SEM.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Laparoscopic repair of a large interstitially incarcerated inguinal hernia.

Journal of surgical case reports·2014
Same author

Capacity and error estimates for boolean classifiers with limited complexity.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Asymptotic properties of discrete unitary transforms.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

GODDESS: A Goal-Directed Decision Structuring System.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same author

Studies in semi-admissible heuristics.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same journal

Real-time EEG-based epileptic seizure prediction using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

R-peak detection and ECG data compression scheme based on empirical mode decomposition and wavelet transform.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

CastNet: A three-channel EEG-based deep learning model for cross-subject depression detection.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

State-of-the-art TinyML approaches for colorectal cancer detection: Current advances, challenges, and future directions.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

JRadiEvo: A Japanese radiology report generation model enhanced by evolutionary optimization of model merging.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causally-informed deep learning towards explainable and generalizable outcome prediction in critical care.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Indirect experiments use encouragement instead of force to study treatment effects. Mathematical insights show these studies can accurately measure causal influences on individuals and populations.

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Experimental design
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involve direct treatment assignment.
  • Ethical or practical constraints sometimes preclude direct assignment, necessitating alternative methods.
  • Indirect experimentation offers a framework when direct control is not feasible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce experimental researchers to mathematical results for analyzing indirect experiments.
  • To demonstrate the utility of indirect experimentation in assessing causal influences.
  • To highlight the value of encouragement designs in research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing mathematical results to analyze data from indirect experiments.
  • Comparing outcomes from encouraged versus non-encouraged groups.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing statistical methods to estimate causal effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Indirect experiments, despite using encouragement, can yield significant causal effect estimates.
    • Data from indirect experimentation can accurately inform about program impact on the whole population.
    • Individual-level causal impacts can also be assessed from indirect experimental data.

    Conclusions:

    • Indirect experimentation is a viable alternative to RCTs when direct assignment is not possible.
    • Mathematical analysis allows for robust causal inference from encouragement designs.
    • This approach provides valuable insights into program effectiveness at both aggregate and individual levels.