Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Augmented spontaneous breathing]

T Hachenberg1

  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald.

Der Anaesthesist
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2019
Same author

Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2019
Same author

Improved ventilation-perfusion matching by abdominal insufflation (pneumoperitoneum) with CO2 but not with air.

Minerva anestesiologica·2013
Same author

The immune response to one-lung-ventilation is not affected by repeated alveolar recruitment manoeuvres in pigs.

Minerva anestesiologica·2013
Same author

[45-year old patient with progressive shortness of breath and "crazy paving"].

Der Internist·2012
Same author

[Quality of anesthesiological expert opinion in medical claims cases].

Der Anaesthesist·2012
Same journal

[Promoting young academics in anesthesiology: factors for an attractive internship].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Respiratory support in COVID-19: all in due time!]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Management of acutely decompensated liver cirrhosis in emergency and critical care medicine].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Anesthesia in patients with acute porphyria].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Quality and safe anesthesia for all children : That is their right!]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
See all related articles

This study explores various mechanical ventilation strategies to support spontaneous breathing in patients with respiratory failure. It highlights how different modes like IMV, PSV, CPAP, APRV, and BIPAP can augment breathing, improve gas exchange, and reduce respiratory muscle fatigue.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary medicine and critical care
  • Respiratory physiology
  • Mechanical ventilation

Context:

  • Impaired pulmonary gas exchange and respiratory muscle fatigue are critical issues in acute respiratory failure.
  • Sepsis, cardiac failure, and altered load conditions can precipitate respiratory muscle fatigue.
  • Augmenting spontaneous breathing requires improving perfusion, metabolism, load conditions, and muscle contractility.

Purpose:

  • To review and compare various mechanical ventilation techniques that support and augment spontaneous breathing.
  • To analyze the mechanisms, advantages, and potential drawbacks of different ventilation modes.
  • To emphasize the importance of maintaining spontaneous breathing in acute respiratory failure.

Summary:

  • Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (IMV) augments alveolar ventilation with periodic positive airway pressure, potentially improving hemodynamics but risking increased work of breathing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) assists spontaneous breaths, aiming to decrease respiratory effort and muscle oxygen consumption, though it doesn't guarantee minimum alveolar ventilation.
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), and Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) are discussed for their roles in maintaining positive airway pressure, improving gas exchange, and supporting spontaneous breathing.
  • APRV and BIPAP offer enhanced safety by maintaining alveolar ventilation even with diminished spontaneous effort.

    • Impact:

    • Understanding these ventilation strategies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in critical care settings.
    • Maintaining and augmenting spontaneous breathing can lead to improved gas exchange (VA/Q distribution) and reduced physiological dead space.
    • These findings support the continued use and development of ventilation techniques that preserve spontaneous respiratory drive.