Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk management issues in the new managed care environment

J W Bettman, B H Demorest, E R Craven

    Survey of Ophthalmology
    |November 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary

    The "dollar defense," or cost-containment, is not a valid legal defense in medical malpractice cases. Healthcare providers cannot use cost-saving measures as justification when patient care is compromised.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Allergic retinosis.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2010
    Same author

    Experimental dinitrophenol cataract.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2010
    Same author

    Production of cataracts in chicks with dinitrophenol.

    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1929)·2010
    Same author

    When it's okay to say you're sorry.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2001
    Same author

    The development of the code of ethics for the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

    Survey of ophthalmology·2000
    Same author

    Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Healthcare Management
    • Ophthalmic Risk Management

    Background:

    • Medical malpractice litigation is a significant concern in healthcare.
    • Cost-containment strategies are increasingly implemented in medical practices.
    • The legal implications of cost-containment in patient care are complex.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze malpractice cases where cost-containment was used as a defense.
    • To determine the legal validity of the "dollar defense" in malpractice claims.
    • To provide insights for healthcare providers on risk management.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of malpractice case law.
    • Analysis of legal arguments presented in "dollar defense" cases.
    • Examination of outcomes in cases utilizing cost-containment defenses.

    Main Results:

    • Cases where cost-containment was the primary defense were unsuccessful.
    • The "dollar defense" was consistently rejected by courts.
    • Using cost-saving measures as a justification for substandard care is legally indefensible.

    Conclusions:

    • Cost-containment strategies should not supersede patient safety and quality of care.
    • Healthcare providers face significant legal risks when prioritizing cost over patient well-being.
    • Effective risk management requires adherence to professional standards regardless of financial considerations.

    Related Experiment Videos