Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

HIV and development

J Decosas1

  • 1ProAction, Montreal, Canada.

AIDS (London, England)
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The local response to HIV in Africa: a question of scale.

AIDS analysis Africa·2002
Same author

Labour migration and HIV epidemics in Africa.

AIDS analysis Africa·2002
Same author

The profile and context of the epidemics of sexually transmitted infections including HIV in Zimbabwe.

Sexually transmitted infections·2002
Same author

Children and AIDS in Africa.

Lancet (London, England)·2001
Same author

The Jaipur paradigm--a conceptual framework for understanding social susceptibility and vulnerability to HIV.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2001
Same author

Reducing HIV-1 in Kenya and Tanzania.

Lancet (London, England)·2000
Same journal

Hazardous alcohol use, sexual behavior, and recent and undiagnosed HIV across 11 Eastern and Southern African countries.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Carotid inflammation on FDG-PET is associated with lower cognitive performance in people with treated HIV infection.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Clinical implications of the new definition of obesity among persons with HIV.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Cabotegravir and rilpivirine resistance-associated mutations among people with newly diagnosed HIV-1 in the Netherlands.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Pitavastatin effect on enterocyte injury markers in an ART treated HIV population: Insights from REPRIEVE.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Blood pressure control in people with HIV and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a real-world descriptive analysis.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic disproportionately affects impoverished and marginalized populations, indicating societal development issues. Its primary impact on developing nations will likely widen economic disparities and increase poverty among women.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Sociology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Disease epidemics are critical historical events shaping societal development.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) distribution patterns correlate with social development indicators.
  • HIV prevalence is highest in impoverished, unstable, and marginalized communities, signifying uneven development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between HIV prevalence and social development.
  • To predict the socio-economic impact of the HIV epidemic on national development.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of global HIV distribution patterns.
  • Correlation of HIV prevalence with socio-economic indicators.
  • Assessment of potential macro-economic and social effects.
Keywords:
Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeDeveloping CountriesDiseasesEconomic DevelopmentEconomic FactorsHiv InfectionsSocial DevelopmentViral Diseases

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • HIV prevalence is linked to indicators of poor or dysfunctional social development.
  • A significant impact on national Gross National Product (GNP) is not anticipated.
  • The epidemic is expected to exacerbate the wealth gap and feminize poverty in developing countries.

Conclusions:

  • The HIV epidemic's long-term effects on national development are complex and difficult to predict.
  • While direct macro-economic impacts may be limited, significant social consequences are evident.
  • Widening economic inequality and increased poverty among women are projected as key outcomes.