A parallelogram approach for safety evaluation of ingested acetaldehyde

Route-specific carcinogenicity data are often lacking for compounds of regulatory importance. Acetaldehyde (AA), for example, a natural constituent in foods, is a rodent carcinogen via the inhalation route, but oral carcinogenicity data are not available. In the absence of such data, a parallelogram approach can be used to estimate the oral carcinogenic potency of this chemical. The relative potency of AA to the structurally related compound formaldehyde (FA) in the nose and the relative potency of FA in the nose and stomach serve as the basis for estimating the potency of AA in the stomach. On a dosimetric basis, inhaled AA is 14- to 35-fold less potent than FA in producing nasal DNA-protein crosslinks (DPX), subchronic tissue injury, and tumors. Ingested AA is also considerably ( approximately 5-fold) less potent than FA in producing gastric injury and DPX. Compared to the nose, the stomach is 10- to 60-fold less sensitive to both AA- and FA-induced DPX and subchronic tissue injury. The parallelogram approach will not supplant long-term oral carcinogenicity studies with AA; however, the consistent pattern of decreased sensitivity of acetaldehyde compared to formaldehyde, lower sensitivity of the stomach to the nose, and the lack of gastric tumorigenicity of orally ingested formaldehyde strongly suggests that ingested acetaldehyde is not likely to be carcinogenic. Successful estimation of the carcinogenic potency of ingested glutaraldehyde, for which chronic oral and inhalation data are available, provides further support that the parallelogram approach can provide a reasonable estimate of the carcinogenic potency of closely related aldehydes, such as AA.