Vascular surgical training of general and vascular surgery residents

The opinions of general surgery program directors (SPDs) and vascular surgery program directors (VPDs) regarding vascular surgery training of general surgery residents and the construct of the vascular surgery residency were compared.

Questionnaires were mailed to 55 VPDs and 290 SPDs in 1987 and 1988, and to 80 VPDs and 277 SPDs in 1995. Both questionnaires included questions regarding attitudes about vascular surgical competence, operative experience, future vascular practice opportunities of general surgery residents, and the impact of a vascular surgery residency on general surgery resident education. In addition, the 1995 survey included questions regarding the duration, content, and prerequisite versus requisite experience for the vascular surgery residency.

Significant differences in opinions between SPDs and VPDs persisted regarding vascular surgery training of general surgery residents. SPDs were more likely to feel that general surgery graduates are fully competent in vascular surgery, should be exposed to more complex vascular surgery during training, and should be granted unlimited vascular surgical privileges on entering practice. Most VPDs felt that general surgery graduates lack competence in vascular surgery, should be exposed to less complex vascular surgery during training, and should have limited vascular surgery privileges in practice. Both groups of program directors agreed about the construct of vascular surgery residencies and that such residencies have had a favorable impact on general surgery resident education. Both SPDs and VPDs were willing to consider creative restructuring of vascular surgery residencies to accommodate governmental restrictions on funding of graduate medical education.

External pressures forcing residency reform may provide an opportunity for SPDs and VPDs to creatively work with regulatory bodies to resolve differences in expectations of vascular surgery education and practice.