Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Facial interpretation and component consistency

L A Sullivan1, S W Kirkpatrick

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.

Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mobilisation, alteration, and redistribution of monosulfidic sediments in inland river systems.

Journal of environmental management·2012
Same author

Monosulfidic black ooze accumulations in sediments of the Geographe Bay area, Western Australia.

Marine pollution bulletin·2010
Same author

Iron-monosulfide oxidation in natural sediments: resolving microbially mediated S transformations using XANES, electron microscopy, and selective extractions.

Environmental science & technology·2009
Same author

Blood lactate concentrations in anesthetized dogs with intracranial disease.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2009
Same author

Iron-sulfide and trace element behaviour in sediments of Coombabah Lake, southern Moreton Bay (Australia).

Marine pollution bulletin·2008
Same author

Schematic drawings of facial expressions for emotion recognition and interpretation by preschool-aged children.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·1996
Same journal

Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2008
Same journal

Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2008
Same journal

Psychologists versus psychologists: evaluating the claims of psychologists who publicly criticize their profession.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2008
Same journal

Measuring the value of nonwage employee benefits: building a model of the relation between benefit satisfaction and value.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2008
Same journal

Therapeutically induced changes in couple identity: the role of we-ness and interpersonal processing in relationship satisfaction.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2007
Same journal

Multiplicative invalidity and its application to complex correlational models.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·2007
See all related articles

Children consistently focused on specific facial areas when identifying emotions. They looked at the mouth for happiness, sadness, surprise, and disgust, and the eyebrows for anger and fear.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Facial expression recognition

Background:

  • Understanding how children interpret facial expressions is crucial for social-cognitive development.
  • Previous research has explored accuracy in emotion recognition, but less is known about consistent focus areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the consistency of facial area focus in children when interpreting emotions.
  • To determine if specific facial regions are prioritized for different emotional expressions.

Main Methods:

  • Eighty 7-year-old girls participated in the study.
  • Participants selected schematic faces representing six emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise).
  • Focus areas were analyzed across multiple trials for each emotion.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Children demonstrated high consistency in their facial area of focus.
  • The mouth (lower facial component) was consistently chosen for happiness, sadness, surprise, and disgust.
  • Eyebrows (upper facial component) were consistently chosen for anger and fear.

Conclusions:

  • Children exhibit consistent patterns in focusing on specific facial areas when interpreting emotions.
  • This consistent focus suggests developing, reliable strategies for emotion recognition in early childhood.