[Diagnostic imaging of aortic pseudoaneurysm: study of 4 clinical cases]

Aortic pseudoaneurysm starts as small disruption of the aortic wall with an extravasation of blood into the mediastinum, contained only by fibrous tissue and by parietal pericardium. The most common cause of this condition is dehiscence or inflammatory processes of suture stitches after surgical interventions on aortic value or ascending sorts. Pseudoaneurysm represents about 40% of complications of cardiac surgery involving the ascending sorts. This complication occurs in about 1% of cases of aortic valve or ascending tract replacement. In this study, we evaluated, with different diagnostic techniques, 4 patients (all males, mean age 48 +/- 23 years, range 17-74) affected by aortic pseudoaneurysm occurring at different times after surgical intervention on the sorts. Clinically only 1 of the 4 patients referred chest pain. Repeated chest radiography and cardiac magnetic resonance were performed in every patient; 3 subjects were evaluated by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography; contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed in 1 patients. Pseudoaneurysm diagnosis obtained by non invasive methods was later confirmed and better described by angiography. Our study demonstrated that transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance are useful and reliable methods in the diagnosis of aortic pseudoaneurysm. However, in case of mediastinal he or pericardial effusion (suggestive of aortic pseudoaneurysm) by transesophageal echocardiography or magnetic resonance, angiography is necessary and may show the exact rupture site on the aortic wall. This diagnostic approach yields enough information for both diagnosis and surgical correction of this rare but high-risk pathological condition.