A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade

E P McCoy1, R K Mirakhur, C Rafferty

  • 1Department of Anaesthetics, Queen's University of Belfast.

Anaesthesia
|October 1, 1996
PubMed

Insights

The McCoy laryngoscopy blade requires significantly less force than the Macintosh blade during the procedure. This reduced force may explain why the McCoy blade lowers patient stress response.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Airway Management

Background:

  • Laryngoscopy is a critical procedure for airway management.
  • Different laryngoscope blades, such as Macintosh and McCoy, are used.
  • The forces applied during laryngoscopy can impact patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using McCoy and Macintosh blades.
  • To investigate the relationship between patient factors and applied forces.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 40 patients undergoing laryngoscopy.
  • Measurement of laryngoscopy duration, maximal forces, and mean force for both blades.
  • Correlation analysis between applied forces and patient anthropometrics (weight, height, BMI).

Main Results:

  • The McCoy blade required significantly less mean force (10.1 N) compared to the Macintosh blade (18.9 N) (p < 0.001).
  • Laryngoscopy duration was similar between the two blades.
  • Force application correlated with patient weight and height for both blades, and BMI for the Macintosh blade.

Conclusions:

  • The McCoy laryngoscope blade exerts significantly less force during laryngoscopy than the Macintosh blade.
  • Reduced force application with the McCoy blade may contribute to a lower stress response.
  • This finding supports the use of the McCoy blade for potentially improved patient safety and comfort.