Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical methods of computing reference values for side-to-side differences in nerve conduction studies

A S Chang1, T R Dillingham, K F Yu

  • 1Department of Clinical Investigation, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of Family-Centered Oral Health Promotion on Toddler Oral Health in Hong Kong.

Journal of dental research·2021
Same author

Levocarnitine for vismodegib-associated muscle spasms: a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated trial.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2018
Same author

On the role of poison centers in radiation emergency preparedness and response activities: findings of the "Radiation Emergencies Public Health Roundtable" (Atlanta, GA-August 2012).

Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology·2013
Same author

Coral communities of the remote atoll reefs in the Nansha Islands, southern South China Sea.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
Same author

Electrodiagnosis and outcome prediction for persons with upper limb symptoms: A pilot study.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2012
Same author

Active immunization of fatty acid translocase specifically decreased visceral fat deposition in male broilers.

Poultry science·2011
Same journal

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Combined with Polarized Light Therapy on Neuropathic Foot Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Study.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Patterns of Outcome Measure Utilization in Stroke Rehabilitation Lower Extremity Trials Conducted in Low-to-Middle versus High-Income Countries.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Response to the Letter to the Editor on "Comparison of Preinjury and Clinical Characteristics Between Adolescents With Sport-Related Concussion and Nonsport-Related Concussion Presenting to a Specialty Concussion Clinic".

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Spinal Schwannoma Mimicking Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Case Highlighting Valsalva-Induced Provocation.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Thinking in Rehabilitation Research.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Fibrocartilaginous Embolism Presenting as Isolated L2-3 Radiculopathy without Spinal Cord Infarction.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

The side-to-side difference (STSD) method is recommended over the absolute values of the STSD (AVSTSD) for establishing normal nerve conduction values. STSD offers more accurate reference values and reduces clinical diagnostic errors.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Establishing accurate reference values for nerve conduction parameters is crucial for diagnosing neurological disorders.
  • Existing methods for calculating side-to-side differences (STSD) have limitations.
  • Comparing STSD and absolute values of STSD (AVSTSD) is necessary to determine the optimal approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the theoretical derivations, statistical simulations, and empirical estimations of two methods for deriving reference values for side-to-side differences in nerve conduction parameters.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the STSD and AVSTSD methods.
  • To determine the recommended method for clinical application.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical derivations comparing STSD and AVSTSD reference values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical simulations to assess sampling errors and variability for both methods.
  • Empirical estimations using clinical data from H reflex (HR) and extensor digitorum brevis reflex (EDBR).

    • Main Results:

    • Theoretical derivations indicated AVSTSD reference values are 0.18% greater than STSD.
    • Simulation studies showed AVSTSD yields greater sampling errors, though differences become trivial with sample sizes > 100.
    • Clinical data revealed AVSTSD overestimated reference values (0.5 ms for EDBR, 0.1 ms for HR), increasing type II error for EDBR.

    Conclusions:

    • The STSD method is more accurate and reliable for establishing normal values for nerve conduction parameters.
    • The AVSTSD method can lead to overestimation of reference values and reduced diagnostic sensitivity.
    • STSD is recommended for establishing normal values and for clinical comparisons in nerve conduction studies.