Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography

H G Chotas1, C E Floyd, G A Johnson

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Radiology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feature and knowledge based analysis for reduction of false positives in the computerized detection of masses in screening mammography.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference·2007
Same author

Expression of the uterine Mx protein in cyclic and pregnant cows, gilts, and mares.

Journal of animal science·2003
Same author

Postpartum uterine involution in sheep: histoarchitecture and changes in endometrial gene expression.

Reproduction (Cambridge, England)·2003
Same author

The Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISG) 17 and Mx have different temporal and spatial expression in the ovine uterus suggesting more complex regulation of the Mx gene.

The Journal of endocrinology·2002
Same author

Evidence that absence of endometrial gland secretions in uterine gland knockout ewes compromises conceptus survival and elongation.

Reproduction (Cambridge, England)·2002
Same author

Application of magnetic resonance microscopy to tissue engineering: a polylactide model.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

A new chest phantom was developed for routine quality control of digital radiography systems. This phantom provides consistent images and detects simulated problems, ensuring reliable chest X-ray quality.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiography Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Routine quality control is essential for maintaining diagnostic accuracy in digital radiography.
  • Existing methods may not offer comprehensive, quantitative assessment of digital radiography systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel chest phantom for routine quality control (QC) of digital radiography (DR) systems.
  • To enable quantitative, full-system performance evaluation in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed a phantom from copper, aluminum, and acrylic, mimicking thoracic radiographic projections.
  • Incorporated regional test objects for quantitative assessment of optical density, contrast detail, and spatial resolution.
  • Conducted validation tests for image stability and sensitivity to induced image quality changes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The phantom produced consistent pseudoclinical images during routine QC testing.
  • Successfully detected simulated issues introduced into the imaging system's performance.
  • Demonstrated sensitivity to changes in image quality parameters.

Conclusions:

  • The developed chest phantom facilitates quantitative, comprehensive testing of DR systems.
  • Enables reliable quality control for clinical chest radiography.
  • Supports consistent and accurate diagnostic imaging through systematic performance evaluation.