Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR urography

S Hussain1, M O'Malley, H Jara

  • 1Professor and Vice-Chairman, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|February 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Re: medical imaging call centre: a communication success story. A reply.

Clinical radiology·2022
Same author

Medical imaging call centre: a communication success story.

Clinical radiology·2021
Same author

Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for primary and post-chemotherapy testis cancer.

Journal of robotic surgery·2021
Same author

Partial orchiectomy: The Princess Margaret cancer centre experience.

Urologic oncology·2020
Same author

Phytochemical management of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) kofoid and white chitwood by Artemisia spp. in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.).

Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia·2019
Same author

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate treatments for acne and acne scarring: the ACNE-Q.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is a sensitive imaging technique for diagnosing urinary obstruction and its causes. While MRU excels at detecting obstruction, it has limitations in visualizing small kidney stones.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Urology

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging advancements for static fluid have enabled MR urography (MRU).
  • MRU is emerging as a key technique for evaluating the urinary system.
  • Intravenous urography (IVU) was previously the standard for urinary tract evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the diagnostic capabilities of MR urography (MRU) for urinary system diseases.
  • To evaluate MRU's effectiveness in diagnosing urinary obstruction and its characteristics.
  • To compare MRU with traditional methods like IVU, considering contrast agent risks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing MR imaging techniques specifically adapted for static fluid visualization.
  • Applying MRU protocols to image the urinary tract, including kidneys and ureters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing MRU findings for urinary obstruction, dilatation, and associated edema.

    • Main Results:

    • MRU demonstrates high sensitivity in diagnosing urinary obstruction, identifying severity, location, and cause.
    • MRU can differentiate acute from non-acute urinary obstruction by detecting perinephric and periuretic edema.
    • Current MRU resolution limitations hinder consistent visualization of nonobstructive or small obstructing calculi.

    Conclusions:

    • MRU is a promising imaging modality for urinary tract evaluation, offering an alternative to IVU without contrast hazards.
    • MRU effectively diagnoses urinary obstruction and aids in differentiating acute from chronic conditions.
    • Further advancements in MR resolution may improve the detection of small calculi.