Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
1Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA.
Abstract:
Paul Smolensky has recently announced that the problem of explaining the compositionality of concepts within a connectionist framework is solved in principle. Mental representations are vectors over the activity states of connectionist "units", but the vectors encode Classical trees, whose structural properties in turn "acausally" explain the facts of compositionality. This sounds suspiciously like the offer of a free lunch, and it turns out, upon examination, that there is nothing to it.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Principle of Moments: Problem Solving
One such scenario involves a pole placed in a three-dimensional system with a cable attached. When a tension is applied to the cable, the moment about the z-axis passing through...
Storage
Principle of Virtual Work: Problem Solving
To apply the principle of virtual work,...

