Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cotton dust sampling, III-estimation of statistical errors with vertical elutriators

M W Suh, J D Neefus

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |August 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study analyzes cotton dust sampling errors using vertical elutriators. Three-hour samples offer better efficiency than six-hour ones at moderate dust levels, with location and equipment errors being minimal.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bacterial contamination of cotton as an indicator of respiratory effects among card room workers.

    British journal of industrial medicine·1979
    Same author

    Cotton dust sampling, II--vertical elutriation.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1977
    Same author

    Cotton dust sampling: I. Short termed sampling.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1975
    Same author

    Steaming of cotton to prevent byssinosis--a plant study.

    British journal of industrial medicine·1974
    Same author

    The nurse and employee health--efficiency and stability: the new bond--surveillance.

    Occupational health nursing·1974
    Same author

    Byssinosis: a study of 10,133 textile workers.

    Archives of environmental health·1973

    Area of Science:

    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Occupational Health

    Background:

    • Accurate measurement of cotton dust is crucial for worker health.
    • Vertical elutriators are standard equipment for dust sampling.
    • Understanding sources of error is key to reliable data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze variance components of cotton dust sampling errors.
    • To develop a method for estimating sampling errors.
    • To compare the efficiency of different sampling durations.

    Main Methods:

    • Statistical analysis of variance components.
    • Evaluation of errors from sampling equipment, location, time, and repetition.
    • Comparison of three-hour versus six-hour vertical elutriator samples.

    Main Results:

    • A thumb-rule for estimating sampling errors based on dust levels was proposed.
    • Three-hour samples were more efficient than six-hour samples at moderate dust levels (0.4-0.6 mg/m3).
    • Six-hour samples were more efficient at low dust levels (0.1-0.2 mg/m3).
    • Errors attributed to location and equipment were found to be insignificant.

    Conclusions:

    • Sampling duration significantly impacts cotton dust measurement accuracy.
    • The proposed thumb-rule aids in error estimation for vertical elutriator samples.
    • Optimizing sampling time based on dust levels can improve measurement reliability.

    Related Experiment Videos