Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Trading forensic and family commitments

A J Kearney1, T G Gutheil, M L Commons

  • 1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

E-mail and psychiatry: some psychotherapeutic and psychoanalytic perspectives.

American journal of psychotherapy·2008
Same author

Sanctity, secrecy, and silence: dilemmas in clinical confidentiality.

Psychiatric annals·2003
Same author

Standards for informed consent in recovered memory therapy.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2002
Same author

The treating psychiatrist thrust into the role of expert witness.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2001
Same author

The phantom expert: unconsented use of an expert's name and/or testimony, as a legal strategy.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2001
Same author

Withholding, seducing, and threatening: a pilot study of further attorney pressures on expert witnesses.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2001
Same journal

Posttraumatic stress disorder, pulp fiction, and the press.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

A comparison of treatment of paraphilias with three serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective study.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Patients' attitudes toward having been forcibly medicated.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

A clinical study of competency in psychiatric inpatients.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Postconcussional disorder and loss of consciousness.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
Same journal

Tales of the crypt for psychiatrists: mourning, melancholia, and mortuary malpractice.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996
See all related articles

Forensic experts face challenges balancing family and professional duties. This study used consumer theory to understand how they make trade-offs between personal and forensic commitments.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Forensic experts often experience conflicting demands between their professional responsibilities and personal family obligations.
  • Understanding the decision-making processes involved in balancing these commitments is crucial for expert well-being and professional efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how forensic experts balance conflicting family and professional commitments.
  • To apply consumer preference theory and behavioral economics to understand these trade-offs.
  • To examine the relationship between individual decision-making patterns, attitudes toward expert witness roles, and personal characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study involving 15 forensic experts.
  • Development of a novel instrument to elicit choices between family and professional commitments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Construction of individual "trading functions" based on elicited choices.
  • Analysis of trading functions in relation to expert witness attitudes and personal characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual trading functions were constructed, illustrating the decision-making process for balancing commitments.
    • The study identified patterns in how forensic experts prioritize or trade off family versus professional obligations.
    • Relationships were explored between these decision-making patterns and participants' views on their expert witness role and personal attributes.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides insights into the complex decision-making of forensic experts navigating dual commitments.
    • Findings suggest that understanding individual trade-offs can inform support systems for forensic professionals.
    • Further research is warranted to explore these dynamics in a larger population and across different forensic specializations.