Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of UTI and CAUTI in a Mouse Model
Published on: June 23, 2015
Urinary tract infections in young febrile children
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. alejo+@pitt.edu
Insights
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in young children. Combining pyuria and bacteriuria tests aids in prompt UTI diagnosis, while pyuria alone can reliably indicate infection, guiding treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) represent a significant clinical challenge in infants and young children.
- Standard urinalysis methods have limitations in accurately diagnosing UTIs in this age group.
- High-risk groups, such as white females with high fever, show a notable prevalence of UTI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate diagnostic methods for UTI in infants and young children.
- To determine the efficacy of combining urinalysis and urine culture for UTI diagnosis.
- To assess the reliability of pyuria as an indicator of UTI versus contamination.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of dipstick urinalysis, hemocytometer white blood cell (WBC) counts, and Gram-stained smears.
- Analysis of the positive predictive value of combined pyuria and bacteriuria versus individual findings.
- Evaluation of urine culture as the gold standard, considering potential contamination and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU).
Main Results:
- Dipstick urinalysis is inadequate for screening UTIs.
- Combining pyuria and bacteriuria offers a high positive predictive value (85%) for prompt UTI treatment.
- Pyuria alone is a reliable marker for differentiating UTI from urinary tract colonization.
- Sustained absence of inflammatory response on repeat urinalysis strongly suggests no infection.
- Outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for UTI appears as effective as inpatient intravenous therapy.
Conclusions:
- Hemocytometer WBC counts and Gram stains are valuable diagnostic tools in different settings.
- Pyuria is a reliable indicator for UTI diagnosis, guiding treatment decisions and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic use.
- Selective, rather than routine, use of imaging studies like renal ultrasound is recommended.
- Voiding cystourethrogram and DMSA scans are valuable for identifying vesicoureteral reflux and renal scarring, respectively.
- The long-term implications of renal scarring require further investigation.
Abstract:
UTI is a common and important clinical problem in infants and young children, with a prevalence of 5.3% among febrile infants seen in our Emergency Department. White females with rectal temperature > or = 39 degrees C are at particularly high risk (prevalence, 17%). Several studies have highlighted the limitations of the standard urinalysis for identifying UTI in infants and young children and have recommended performance of both urinalysis and urine culture. Alternative methods such as dipstick urinalysis, although attractive because of ease of performance, are inadequate as a screen for UTI. Hemocytometer WBC counts of an uncentrifuged urine specimen can be performed in an office or hospital-based laboratory with minimal training. Performance of Gram-stained smears, however, is most appropriate for the hospital-based laboratory. In the hospital setting where both tests can readily be performed, the positive predictive value of the combination of pyuria and bacteriuria (85%) allows prompt institution of antimicrobial therapy before culture results are available, whereas the lower positive predictive value of the single finding of either pyuria or bacteriuria (40%) justifies delaying treatment decisions until culture results are available. In the office setting where hemocytometer counts can easily be performed, culturing only specimens with pyuria and those of children presumptively treated with antimicrobials will result in the identification of almost all patients with true UTI, sparing large health care expenditures. Although the urine culture is traditionally regarded as the gold standard of UTI, positive urine cultures may occur secondary to contamination or in cases of ABU, leading to a false diagnosis of UTI. In contrast we found pyuria to be a reliable marker to discriminate infection from colonization of the urinary tract. The sustained absence of an inflammatory response, on repeat UA within 24 h, constitutes strong evidence that infection is absent. Management of ABU is controversial; many experts recommend withholding antibiotics because eradication of low virulence organisms may be followed by colonization with more virulent species that cause pyelonephritis. Preliminary results of our ongoing treatment trial suggest that management of young febrile children with UTI as outpatients receiving oral cefixime is as efficacious as inpatient management with intravenous cefotaxime. Results of renal ultrasound and DMSA scan at the time of infection have not modified management in any patient. Accordingly selective rather than routine performance of ultrasound is recommended. A voiding cystourethrogram at 1 month and a DMSA scan 6 months later have been valuable in identifying patients with vesicoureteral reflux and renal scarring, respectively. Among patients initially identified as having acute pyelonephritis, the incidence of renal scarring at 6 months has been substantially more frequent (approximately 40%) than we had expected. However, the long term implications of small scars identified with renal scintigraphy remain to be determined.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

