Related Experiment Videos
Summary
Researchers revisited Erving Goffman's work on institutionalization and secondary adjustments. They found these phenomena persist but question if secondary adjustments always follow institutionalization, suggesting it may benefit some patients.
Area of Science:
- Sociology
- Social Psychology
- Mental Health Studies
Background:
- Revisiting Erving Goffman's seminal work "Asylum".
- Examining phenomena of institutionalization and secondary adjustment at Saint Elizabeths Hospital 20 years later.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the continued presence of institutionalization and secondary adjustment.
- To question the direct causal link between institutionalization and secondary adjustment.
- To challenge the automatic condemnation of institutionalization.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative re-examination of Goffman's concepts in a contemporary setting.
- Observational and analytical approach to social phenomena within an institution.
Main Results:
- Both institutionalization and secondary adjustment phenomena were observed.
- Evidence suggests secondary adjustments do not invariably follow institutionalization.
- Doubt cast on the automatic negative perception of institutionalization.
Conclusions:
- Institutionalization and secondary adjustment remain relevant sociological concepts.
- The relationship between institutionalization and secondary adjustment requires nuanced understanding.
- Institutionalization may be a beneficial or preferred approach for certain patient populations.