Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CSs and USs: what's the difference?

L M Gunther1, R R Miller, H Matute

  • 1Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probing size variations of molecular aggregates inside chlorosomes using single-object spectroscopy.

The Journal of chemical physics·2021
Same author

Plasma and acrosomal membrane lipid content of saltwater crocodile spermatozoa.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2021
Same author

Examining Differences in Recovery Outcomes between Male and Female Hip Fracture Patients: Design and Baseline Results of a Prospective Cohort Study from the Baltimore Hip Studies.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2018
Same author

Multi-site and nasal swabbing for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: what does a single nose swab predict?

The Journal of hospital infection·2017
Same author

Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Multiple-strain colonization in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2014
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Biological significance, not temporal order, determines how stimuli representations are processed. Preexposure effects reveal that biologically significant stimuli are less affected by context extinction, influencing learning.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Learning and memory
  • Stimulus processing

Background:

  • Conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (CSs and USs) processing differences may depend on training order or biological significance.
  • CS- and US-preexposure effects offer a method to investigate these processing differences.
  • Context extinction's differential attenuation of CS- vs. US-preexposure effects suggests distinct processing mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine whether temporal order or biological significance dictates stimulus representation processing.
  • To investigate the role of context extinction in modulating preexposure effects.
  • To elucidate the factors influencing how conditioned and unconditioned stimuli are represented in memory.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) preexposure paradigms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed context extinction procedures between stimulus preexposure and subsequent training.
  • Manipulated the temporal order and biological significance of stimuli in Event 1-->Event 2 pairings.

    • Main Results:

    • Context extinction more readily attenuated the US-preexposure effect than the CS-preexposure effect.
    • Context extinction alleviated response deficits from Event 1 preexposure when Event 1 was biologically significant.
    • Context extinction alleviated response deficits from Event 2 preexposure when Event 2 was biologically significant.

    Conclusions:

    • Biological significance, rather than temporal order, is the primary determinant of how stimulus representations are processed.
    • The findings highlight the crucial role of biological importance in associative learning and memory.
    • This research clarifies the mechanisms underlying differential processing of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.