Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mnemonics for variability: remembering food delay

D Brunner1, S Fairhurst, G Stolovitzky

  • 1Division of Biopsychology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA. dani@paradox.psych.columbia.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes and qualitative interviews in patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the phase III EMBER-3 trial.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

GW250114: Testing Hawking's Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Pigeons

Area of Science:

  • Animal Cognition
  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Comparative Psychology

Background:

  • Investigating memory and decision-making in animal models is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.
  • Reinforcement schedules significantly influence animal behavior and learning.
  • Previous models of memory in decision-making have limitations in explaining observed response patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine memory and decision processes in pigeons (Columba livia) under different reinforcement schedules.
  • To compare the predictive accuracy of two distinct memory models in explaining pigeon behavior.
  • To determine which memory model best accounts for response rates during unreinforced trials.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments using White Carneaux pigeons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discrete-trial peak procedure with mixed reinforced and unreinforced trials.
  • Measurement of response rate during unreinforced trials to assess memory and decision-making.

    • Main Results:

    • Both the complete-memory and minimax models partially explained response rate patterns.
    • The minimax model, which assumes limited memory of reinforcement intervals, accurately predicted the cessation of responding.
    • The complete-memory model failed to account for the observed stopping behavior.

    Conclusions:

    • Pigeon decision-making under variable reinforcement is better explained by a model with limited memory.
    • The minimax model provides a more parsimonious and accurate account of memory constraints in this task.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the neural and cognitive underpinnings of memory and choice behavior.