Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Haematuria: glomerular or non-glomerular?

R Singbal1, B V Mittal

  • 1Department of Pathology, Seth G.S. Medical College, Bombay.

Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Phase contrast microscopy is the most sensitive method for detecting dysmorphic red blood cells in urine, outperforming standard light microscopy techniques for diagnosing hematuria.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anemia, inflammation and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients.

Clinical nephrology·2011
Same author

Lithium toxicity: a double-edged sword.

Kidney international·2007
Same author

Atheroembolic renal disease: a silent masquerader.

Kidney international·2007
Same author

Hematuria in a patient with class IV lupus nephritis.

Kidney international·2006
Same author

Idiopathic necrotising granulomatous interstitial nephritis.

Journal of postgraduate medicine·2002
Same author

Haemangiopericytoma of kidney: a report of 2 cases.

Journal of postgraduate medicine·2000

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Urology
  • Clinical Pathology

Background:

  • Significant hematuria necessitates accurate diagnostic methods.
  • Identifying dysmorphic red blood cells in urine is crucial for determining the source of bleeding.
  • Standard microscopy techniques may have limitations in detecting subtle red blood cell morphological changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the sensitivity of three distinct methods for detecting dysmorphic red blood cells in urinary sediment.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of phase contrast microscopy versus light microscopy (plain and Wright's stained) in identifying red blood cell abnormalities.
  • To correlate the findings with final clinical diagnoses in patients presenting with significant hematuria.

Main Methods:

  • Examination of urinary sediment from 80 consecutive patients with significant hematuria.
  • Utilized three diagnostic techniques: phase contrast microscopy, Wright's staining, and simple light microscopy.
  • Statistical comparison of the sensitivity of each method and correlation with final diagnoses.

Main Results:

  • Phase contrast microscopy demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting dysmorphic red blood cells compared to light microscopy.
  • A higher percentage of red blood cell dysmorphism was identified using phase contrast microscopy.
  • The findings from phase contrast microscopy showed a stronger correlation with definitive diagnoses.

Conclusions:

  • Phase contrast microscopy is the preferred method for evaluating urinary red blood cell morphology in cases of significant hematuria.
  • Standard light microscopy, even with Wright's staining, is less sensitive for detecting subtle red blood cell dysmorphism.
  • Accurate identification of dysmorphic erythrocytes via phase contrast microscopy aids in precise diagnosis of renal and urinary tract conditions.

Related Experiment Videos